Real-life ‘Judgment Fraud’ by the UAE Administration Uncovered!

Shaikh-Saif-Bin-Zayed-Al-Nahyan-Deputy-Prime-Minister-and-Interior-Minister-UAEReal-life ‘Judgment Fraud’ by the UAE Administration Uncovered! Friday, April 04, 2014 New Delhi

The case of the victim emerged from manipulation of power by the UAE Administration. The subsequent fact that the judgment(s) had been pronounced long past and that its implementation was twisted by the culprits who have access to those in power. [Photograph: Lieutenant General Sheikh Saif Bin Zayed AlNahyan, the Minister of Interior, United Arab Emirates]

There may be countries in the world which delays justice on the basis of enforcing judgments. But the Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE), is the only place in the world as a ‘real-life examples of ‘Judgment Fraud’, to avoid honoring obligations!

“A story of frightening, inhuman and deadly tortures; the blatant violation of the law and the most shocking travesty of Constitution of the United Arab Emirates to which the victim was exposed to”.

A brief background of the case

The victim (hereinafter called “Petitioner”), in the case was a high earning engineering expert and investor from India with established contracting and trading businesses. He had a unique opportunity of observing the country for over 18 years. He had been an active participant in the developmental activities of that country. On 26th October 1995 the petitioner signed a lease agreement on behalf of his principal company, the ‘Premier General Contracting Est’., with a landlord, Mr. Hassan Saeed, a native of Abu Dhabi, covering a Nine Storied Building proposed to be leased out for a sum of UAE Dirhams 1.08 million (USD 2,94,000.00) Per Annum, with condition to renew semi-annually.

Civil Suit against a local

The trouble started when the landlord wanted to wriggle out of the contract and was not willing to perform his obligations under the terms and conditions of the contract. The petitioner had already taken up essential renovations including painting, replacement of civil and electro-mechanical fittings that worth UAE Dirham 3 Lakhs. Meanwhile, the landlord had sold some of these flats to others against the terms and conditions of the contract and contrary to law. As such, a dispute arose with the landlord and the petitioner.

On the basis of legal advice, the petitioner instituted a Civil Suit in Abu Dhabi Court for settling the issue. The conspiracy on the part of the landlord to avoid paying debts was one of the important and thrusting points in the civil suit. An interim order was granted by Abu Dhabi Court of Justice in favour of the petitioner.

Though the petitioner had acted only as a law abiding citizen, and in accordance with legal advice secured in that behalf, and had only sought relief from a court of justice, the landlord took it as a personal affront and planned and executed violent and reckless revenge against the petitioner defying all legal provisions and principles of fair-play. He was claiming to be a close associate of the office of the ‘Crown Prince’ of Abu Dhabi. He abused the acquaintance and intimacy with the office of ‘Crown Prince’ for making wrongful gain at the expense of the petitioner. Certain corrupt police officials colluded with him.

The frightening, inhuman and deadly tortures to which the victim was exposed to: The petitioner had to undergo extremes of inhuman and deadly tortures from Abu Dhabi Police which no human being could withstand. However, he was spared from death.

The critical incident took place on Thursday, 26th October 1995, around noon when the landlord along with one of his accomplices made a forcible entry into the petitioner’s place, the petitioner was threatened to withdraw the Civil Suit. The petitioner could not yield to such illegal and unjust demands and therefore refused to accede. Reacting terribly to the situation by securing the help of ‘the extortion mafia working under Abu Dhabi Police’, they ransacked the entire office of the petitioner and robbed him of all cash and valuables. [A large quantities of money, worth UAE Dirham 3.5 Lakhs, was looted from the vault which was kept for the distribution of wages for employees]. The petitioner sought intervention from the police. The police did come, but instead of helping the petitioner, they started abusing him, beating and kicking, in a horrifyingly violent manner, using with hands, fists, legs and even (hands) with metal shackles.

The petitioner was shackled and literally dragged out of his office along the street to the Police vehicle, in the presence of known friends and bystanders.

He was then confined to a detention center where he was again brutally tortured. There was a policeman who shouted “We know how to teach Indians” and asked the petitioner to sign some documents. When the petitioner refused, they forced him to lay down on the floor, took out their Arabic turban and rolled it on petitioner’s entire head and started hitting and kicking on the head with their legs. Another in uniform pulled out his fingernail with a cutter.

Due to the heinous forms of torture, the petitioner’s finger nail was entirely torn apart. As a result, the petitioner became unconscious and soon thereafter he was taken to hospital-emergency, Abu Dhabi. Treatment was made without removing the shackles, hands cuffed behind the back. Over a dozen of X-rays were taken at the hospital of the different parts of his body.

Bizarre twist in the case of police extortion by duty officer of the rank of Captain, Abu Dhabi Police The duty and responsibility of the authority to protect the judgment creditor against the threats of violence was left unattended.

When those atrocities were being committed in the police station, the petitioner’s sponsor, Mr. Easa Ahmed met the duty officer of ‘Asma Police Station’, who is of Captain’s rank to enquire about the arrest of the petitioner. He was then told a concocted story that accused (the petitioner) had hit three of his police staff and an Emirati, and that one police official and the Emirati, the local man, was in a serious condition and admitted in the hospital and that, they were not permitted to allow him to see the accused (the petitioner).

After hearing such a story from a high ranking official, the sponsor did not pursue the matter, in view of the authoritarian methods prevalent in that country. Such (fake) stories have been repeated many times to others who approached to help petitioner. (A similar medical report submitted by them before the Criminal Court was proved false and subsequently rejected by the Abu Dhabi Court of Justice).

The petitioner was subjected to the greatest ordeals by being taken from hospital to the underground lock-up and illegally kept incommunicado in solitary confinement. He was confined to secret detention centers in different days with all sorts of malpractices resulting in injury, bodily damage and injury to his reputation. The petitioner was warned about the consequences if he will not withdraw the civil suit which was filed against the landlord. The dreadful agony and blackmailing was continued therein for 21 days and later the victim was taken to central prison at Al Wathba, Abu Dhabi.

Al Wathba Central Prison, Abu Dhabi

The Al Wathba Central Prison in Abu Dhabi was overcrowded with more than three thousand prisoners – three or four times larger than its actual holding capacity. In scorching heat of the desert, within concrete cages, prisoners were made to live in inhuman conditions without the basic amenities of life. Not even a fan had been provided in those concrete cages. Many prisoners were dumped in the corridors and pinning for a little cool breeze. Even a breath of fresh air was a precious boon!

The food was most unpalatable and unhygienic. Prisoners sustained their life with fermented camel meat and wormy food-grains and clamoured there for a glass of cold water in the hot summer days. The heartening fact is that many innocents are made to languish here under the banner of criminals which cast a stigma on them for life.

The Agony and Pain

Throughout the entire period of detention, the petitioner was subjected to all forms of humiliation, mental agony and unimaginable pain. Though the prison

with appealing exterior has been constructed, that remained only a show-piece for the police administration to parade before visiting personalities from the outside world. The petitioner, along with three thousand other prisoners in the central prison had been subjected to the most cruel torture and deprivation of basic amenities. [Link: The Prison-life of the Petitioner – ‘My Prison-life in Abu Dhaib']

Financial Losses

Torture and other cruel, inhuman treatment continued unabated at Al Wathba prison, Abu Dhabi. The petitioner was not allowed to communicate with anyone. The petitioner’s contracting and trading activities got stammered, causing heavy loss.

The petitioner suffered huge losses for non-communication and by not allowing him to have meeting with any person or to sign any paper with the outside world. This resulted in the cancellation of contracts and liability to pay damages to various departments, contractors, dealers and many and varied financial obligations. Since the petitioner was the prime operator of his Trading and Contracting establishments, his absence had its natural consequence of throwing the different works of the establishment out of gear.

Business Loss

All these resulted in the loss of physical assets, material damages, strategic resources, trust, reputation, loss of corporate identity; the goodwill, prestige, image, opportunities and social status, all painstakingly built by the petitioner over two decades of prime of his life were lost. A corporate identity established with due professional care and attention had been tarnished. The anguish resultant from the deprivation of his establishments, assets and reputation earned exclusively through the untiring personal efforts of the petitioner causes extreme mental depression which will virtually make his life only a vegetable existence. [Link: The details of Business Establishments in Abu Dhabi, owned by the petitioner]

A Long Journey To Court

The victim was brought to the court on 27 (Twenty Seven) occasions, dragged with shackles, manacled and cuffed on both hands and legs as if the victim is a dangerous criminal. Such inhuman treatment was inflicted even on women contrary to all injunctions of Islamic faith.

The prisoners look for the day when they are presented in Court as that is the only occasion when they could breathe fresh air and see the outside world and fellow human beings. The very process of journey to Court is an ordeal. The prisoners are informed about their production in Court only the previous day. Such prisoners who are to be produced before the Court are picked up from different prison cells. The process starts soon after midnight.

The 120 km. trip to the Court in an armoured truck and the return there from through desert in harsh hot weather, thus often become ordeals and created agonizing situations. Most of the prisoners fall sick for a long duration of about two weeks after every such Court trip.

Whenever a prisoner is taken out of the jail, they will be dragged with shackles, manacled and cuffed on both hands and legs. Such inhuman treatment is inflicted even on women contrary to all injunctions of Islamic faith. We had been handcuffed and legs placed in the painful grip of fetters on all twenty seven occasions when we were taken from prison to Court to face the trial, in an armoured covered truck. Although its capacity was 15 persons, about 50 persons were packed like salted fish making each one gasp for breath during the journey.

False Allegations against Petitioner The blatant violation of the law and the most shocking travesty of Constitution of the United Arab Emirates to which the victim was exposed to:

On 11/02/1996, after four months of arrest, a false case was registered against the petitioner under the case No. 152/1996 offenses, alleging “Using force against Government employee and assault”. Untold sufferings were also inflicted on the petitioner as an under-trial prisoner. The public prosecution demonstrated extraordinary misconduct in its investigation.

The petitioner was kept waiting all these days in a small and narrow room in the Court premises, along with other prisoners without any ventilation or so, but not called up for hearing. The witnesses of the petitioner and his counsels were present, but their depositions were also not recorded. This blocking of access to a Court of Justice also constitutes violation of Human Rights by the State itself. All these constitute the grossest and wanton violation of Human Rights.

It took six months thereafter, for the petitioner to have his first appearance in Court. The witnesses did not care the threat of State police and Public prosecution, and they dared to explain the facts. The Court listened to the evidences of eye-witnesses from different nationalities. Mr. Saleem Raza, a Pakistani who said a policeman was holding an iron bar of one meter length in his hand, threatening anyone who came near the office premises of the accused and was shouting “Indian, Pakistani and Bengalis all are thieves and procurers”.

Mr. Zulfiqar Ali who gave similar statement, moreover he added-that the appellee have neither resisted the police nor they have beaten anyone from the patrolling squad and that the appellee are of good nature “I am a Pakistani and they are Indian, no relations are between us, and my testimony is based on truth only. Further the Court listened to the statement of the 3rd witness Mr. Shirban Kalobar from Iran, whose testimony came similar to the declaration of the first two witnesses.

On 10/4/1996 the innocence of the petitioner had been ultimately upheld by the Hon’ble Judge Mohammed Abdul Raheem Al Khoori, Judge of Abu Dhabi Legal Court of first instance, acquitted the petitioner of all the charges levelled against him in the presence of Mr. Mohammed Obaid Al Kabi, the Prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Abdul Fattah Sayed Ahmed, the secretary, under the case No. 152/1996, and directed the authorities to prosecute the policeman involved and also the plaintiff – for being guilty of deception.

The atrocities committed did not come to an end up there; the office of the Public Prosecutor, Abu Dhabi filed an appeal against the decree of the legal court of the first instance. On 18/04/1996 the appeal was set for hearing. The petitioner was granted bail on the filing of the appeal. However, despite the bail order and sureties, he was not released from the prison.

During the next hearing, the police officer, Mr. Ahmed Abdulla Abdul Khadir, dropped his claim from his complaint in the Apex Court, with a declaration attested by the Notary Public Abu Dhabi, under number 2314/96 dated 17/3/1996. The landlord too declared that he had no case against the victim and accepted his attempt to create false evidence against the victim. The other two policemen involved in the case, who in fact, became the instrument of horrific torture designed to extort money, declared-that they were misguided by the police officer.

On 19/5/1996 the eminent Jurists Panel of Apex Court of Abu Dhabi, under presidency of the Judge: Hon’ble Abdul Baqi Abdul Hakam, and the membership of the two other judges (1) Hon’ble Hasan Shareef Al Jafri (2) Hon’ble Mohammad AI Aboodi, upheld the finding of the Trial Court and commented adversely and strongly against the illegal and high- handed acts of the officials.

The Apex Court found that the victim is innocent; rather ‘a martyr’. The Court observed further that the case was wholly false, baseless and that it was fabricated by the police for personal gain. “The Court observed that all the pieces of evidence indicated the properness of the behavior of the victim, the accused. Some of these findings of fact are proof of violation of Human Rights and International Conventions”.

“It further reiterated the condemnation of prosecutor”. The appellate review highlighted the culpability of the policeman and emphasized the notoriety of his actions and violations of Human Rights.

The Court, therefore, ordered restoration of the victim’s dignity, and compensate him for all his losses while pronouncing a ‘Landmark Judgment’.

The Court having been convinced about the innocence of the petitioner quoted the Islamic Law that should be practiced by everyone following the Islam Religion. The Apex Court illustrated the petitioner as a ‘martyr’ in the Judgment and highlighted the intense miseries he went through.

An excerpt from the Appellate Judgment as follows:-

“Verily the Islamic law and the entire positive laws have honoured man and protected his freedom, his honour, his property and his soul. Hence, if man was killed while protecting these, he is considered to be a ‘martyr’. And limitation of his freedom without any right is an unforgiving crime and the same is mentioned in the provisions of articles 2 and 3 of the penal procedure code. And it is proved in this case that the policemen along-with the local went to arrest the accused, without any right and curtailed his freedom”.

A true copy of Arabic including English translation of ‘the Final Judgment’ is available here (Link: ‘Key excerpts from the summary of the judgment, Abu Dhabi Legal Courts‘)

Deportation Order of General Directorate Police, Abu Dhabi, UAE Real-life examples of judgment fraud, the way how the Ministry of Interior, United Arab Emirates (UAE), bypassing it’s Court Orders to avoid honoring obligations!

In the wake of the concurrent judicial findings of the Court, the victim should have been restored to his former status and position and adequately compensated for the mental agony and sufferings and pecuniary losses suffered by him. Unfortunately, the Abu Dhabi officials acted in total defiance of the findings and sentiments expressed by the judicial establishments of the country.

The petitioner was detained at further extent without the due respect of the law of the land. On 28-9-1996 by virtue of the administrative decision number 227/1996, the authority decided to deport the petitioner from the UAE in total disregard to the crucial legal position that the petitioner had a valid visa of a ‘sole investor’ and had his ‘own business’ establishments in the UAE. The petitioner was re-victimized in a manner that was extremely ‘libelous’ – by ‘false statement of facts as if he was punished for a crime’.

The deportation order was signed by one Captain Hamad Ahmed, then head of security affairs department, general directorate police of Abu Dhabi, UAE.

The petitioner was deported back to India in total negation of the law, virtually denying all the constitutional rights of that country. The constitution and union laws of the UAE were blatantly violated abridged as enshrined including the well-established principles of ‘International Laws and the Covenants’.

The deportation order reads: “Under the charge of applying force against a government employee ”which could instill fear and suspicion in the general public, associating or dealing with the petitioner. It caused a situation of re-victimization associated with great pain, loss of dignity, loss of the court ordered monetary compensation including his inability to recapture the past glory, which the victim could have achieved had the judgment of the Legal Courts of Abu Dhabi had been implemented in time.

The Apex Court had already found the claim against victim was fabricated. An excerpt of Judgment reads “All the evidence indicates to the appropriateness of his behavior”. “The court was ruled that, there is not a shred of evidence which can prove the accusation. On the contrary there was ample evidence that it was the policeman who assaulted the victim”.

It is respectfully submitted that flouting the orders of a judicial body is totally destructive of the Rules of Law and norms internationally upheld for safeguarding Human Rights. The very concept of having an independent judiciary to protect the citizen from Executive excesses crumbles down by such an action on the part of Government officials.

The domestic law of the country permits recovery for reputational harm and economic losses flowing from the falsity of a defamatory statement. A true copy of ‘the Deportation Order, by ‘Captain Hamad Ahmed is available here (Link: ‘Deportation Order of General Directorate Police, Abu Dhabi, UAE’ Arabi & English)

‘No Entry & Cancellation of Residence Visa’ The official in the UAE was instrumental for cheating an Indian Investor, depriving him of his rightful benefits from a Portfolio of Judgments

of that country. The Judgment of the Apex Court of Abu Dhabi was worth hundreds of millions as compensation to restore the life of petitioner, his dignity and his business establishments.

The petitioner’s visa has been cancelled and has made an endorsement of ‘No Entry’ in his passport. There was no legality to cancel a valid residence permit of a rightful investor. The petitioner was not involved in any crime or any consequences that may ultimately call for his removal him from the UAE. The victim was a ‘judgment creditor’ and he was living in the UAE over the last 18 years and was a sole investor of a group of business establishments. The Emirate, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE), is answerable vicariously and otherwise for all such violations of law.

The officials in the Ministry of Interior, UAE, not only cheated a Judgment Creditor but it also cheated the entire pillars of constitutional doctrine of that country. The Ministry of Interior, Abu Dhabi, UAE, also owe huge debts to the Judgment creditor, solely and exclusively responsible for the closure of ‘his various business establishments in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates’.

‘Download full PDF article (Size: 295 KB)’

References

Coming Soon!

“The worst cheating scandal of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE)”

There may be many countries in the world which delays justice on the basis of enforcing judgments. But the Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE), is the only place in the world as a ‘real-life examples of judgment fraud, to avoid honoring its obligations! “We bet it’s the worst case of cheating you’ve ever heard from a civilized country or a member States of the United Nations”. [Feature: "The worst cheating scandal of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE)"] “Why Abu Dhabi, UAE, is the most fraudulent authoritarian state (Regime) in the world”?

“The world is too dangerous to live in, not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who sit and let it happen.” [Feature: Why Abu Dhabi is the most fraudulent authoritarian state in the world?]

Posted in Abu Dhabi, BCCI Scandal, Dictators, Etihad Airways, Human Rights, Human Rights Law, India, Indo-Gulf Reparations, Judgments, Justice for Torture, Landmark UAE Judgment, Ministry of External Affairs, Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs, Sheikh Khalifa, Sheikh Mohammed, Survivors Support, Torture Abolition, UAE, UAE Lawyers, UAE Ministry of Interior, UAE plots, UAE Reputation, UN Convention Against Torture, UN Special Rapporteur, Uncategorized, United Arab Emirates, United Nations | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Solidarity with UAE lawyers

Federal-supreme-court-in-Abu-Dhabi-UAESolidarity with UAE lawyers
17 February 2014 ‘Law Gazette U.K’

Earlier this month, the UN special rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Gabriela Knaul, published the findings of her nine-day visit to the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

Knaul concluded that the UAE judiciary is under the ‘de facto’ control of the government; that lawyers are working without detailed understanding of a critical state security law that was enacted but never published; that lawyers are threatened, harassed, pressured and placed under surveillance by UAE authorities; and that evidence against defendants is ‘sometimes manipulated and fabricated by the police or other security agencies and the prosecution’.

Knaul also stated that there is ‘credible information and evidence’ that detainees are arrested without warrant, blindfolded, taken to unknown places, held incommunicado, sometimes for months, and tortured.

Among the cases that were brought to Knaul’s attention were the convictions last year of a number of lawyers on charges of ‘plotting to overthrow the state’ after an unfair trial marred by irregularities. Those convicted to lengthy sentences included former judges Ahmed al-Zaabi and Mohammed Saeed al-Abdouli, prominent human rights lawyers Dr Mohammed al-Mansoori and Dr Mohammed al-Roken, and their lawyer Salem al-Shehhi, who was arrested at the offices of the state security prosecutor where he sought information about his clients.

All were arbitrarily detained for months and complained of being tortured in detention, including through prolonged solitary confinement, physical beating and sleep deprivation.

Knaul was also prevented from visiting Qatari physician Mahmoud al-Jaidah in prison despite expressing grave concerns about torture and due process in his case. Dr al-Jaidah was arbitrarily detained for nine months in a secret prison in Abu Dhabi before he was charged. The verdict in his case will be announced on 3 March, although until now no fewer than three lawyers have ceased to represent him within days of being instructed and no lawyer has been permitted to visit him.

We stand in solidarity with the lawyers in the UAE and call upon the authorities to unconditionally release them and quash their convictions. The UAE must understand that its persecution of members of the legal profession and its manipulation of the judiciary have damaged its reputation more than the words and actions of any single dissident.

Nicholas Fluck, president of the Law Society; Professor Sara Chandler, chair of the Human Rights Committee of the Law Society; Kirsty Brimelow QC, chair of the Bar Human Rights Committee; and 37 others. ‘Law Gazette U.K’

Resource Links:

UN report says UAE judiciary under ‘de facto’ control of rulers, calls for torture probe

The U.N. Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers Gabriela Knaul offer a rare look into the Gulf Emirates’ judicial system. She said she discovered credible claims of detainees who were held incommunicado for months, exposed to extreme temperatures, and sometimes electrocuted. ‘The U.N. Special Rapporteur Gabriela Knaul’

‘Oh, I have lost my reputation! I have lost the immortal part of myself, and what remains is bestial’. The Executive of the State was duty bound to adhere to the orders of the Judiciary of the land. Flouting the orders of a judicial body is totally destructive of the Rules of Law and norms internationally upheld for safeguarding Human Rights. “Reputation of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates!”

 

Posted in Abu Dhabi, Dictators, Etihad Airways, Gabriela Knaul, Human Rights, Human Rights Law, Judgments, Justice for Torture, Ministry of External Affairs, Sheikh Khalifa, Sheikh Mohammed, Survivors Support, Torture Abolition, U.S. ETIHAD Deal, UAE, UAE Lawyers, UAE plots, UAE Reputation, UN Convention Against Torture, UN Special Rapporteur, Uncategorized, United Arab Emirates, United Nations | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Reputation, reputation, reputation! Oh, I have lost my reputation!

Reputation of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates!
January 02, 2014

Reputation, reputation, reputation! Oh, I have lost my reputation! I have lost the immortal part of myself, and what remains is bestial. My reputation, Iago, my reputation! [Cassio - Act II, scene iii]: William Shakespeare, Othello

‘COMING SOON! ’

Truth and Justice have been nakedly sacrificing for ‘Reputation’
of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. …‘JFS PUBLICATIONS!’


Resources

India should fulfill its due international obligations to ensure the rights to all individuals
Serious failures and inadequacies to comply with statutory or regulatory obligations on the part of the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) have been involved in a series of incidents in the recent years. Latest in the series is a diplomatic rift between the United States and India over the treatment meted out to Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade, an accused in New York on multiple crimes. The whole country is now escalating into a major diplomatic furor to save Ms. Khobragade. Such a spear-headed attack has never been made in the past by India to save its citizens who were in much troubled situation in foreign countries. The prolonged struggle of Overseas Indians in the Gulf Countries

 ‘Indo – Gulf Reparation Mechanisms’ Movement Updates
Strategy Formulation and Implementation of a Mutual Human Rights Law and Reparation Mechanisms Between the Government of India and the GCC countries. … More Details.

“The Sale Prospects of UAE Judgments Portfolio” A unique and assured investment opportunity for ‘Social Justice’, because of its strong Legal back-up and Government support. “The execution of Judgments of the UAE Court is a part of ‘Indo-Gulf Reparation’ Movement”. Millions of Overseas Indians will be the beneficiaries of a ‘Mutual Reparation Mechanism’ if put into practical effect. “Give a hand to enforce the UAE Judgments and thereby strengthening the Integrity of the Judiciary and people’s confidence in our Judicial Systems”


How to buy a UAE Judgment Portfolio?
Outright sale of a judgment is not envisioned. Funds are proposed to be raised by distribution of shares. One can invest a sum as small as $USD 1,000.00 in the Portfolio of UAE Judgments now on sale!

The UAE Judgments have been guaranteed three times more value of investment along with 4.5% yearly bonus. In some cases, the earnings will go up Ten Times (ie. $1,000 x 10 = $USD 10,000.00) worth their investment. ..“How do I become a voluntary contributor?”

‘Share This Flag’
It is high time the world community of nations realize their commitment

and responsibilities toward the humanity, especially the innocent civilians in
the Middle Eastern countries and intervene to give justice to them. All that the people
in those countries are struggling for long and wanted to have is a little breath of freedom. “It’s dangerous to be right when the government is wrong -
View UAE Flagbearers”

Share this flag

Posted in Abu Dhabi, BCCI Scandal, Camel Jockeys, Dictators, Egyptian coup d'etat, Etihad Airways, Human Rights, Human Rights Law, India, Indo-Gulf Reparations, JET-ETIHAD Deal, Judgments, Justice for Torture, Ministry of External Affairs, Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs, Sheikh Khalifa, Sheikh Mohammed, Survivors Support, Torture Abolition, U.S. ETIHAD Deal, UAE, UAE plots, UAE Reputation, UN Convention Against Torture, Uncategorized, United Arab Emirates, United Nations | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

‘India’s national shame’

‘India’s national shame’
25 October, 2013: Delhi

The establishments of institutional arrangements for the welfare of ‘Overseas Indian Community’, as highlighted by the Government of India, are intentionally deceptive, untruthful and purport to demonstrate that there are procedural remedies or tactics.

Overseas-Indian-Affairs-Ministry-Migrant-RightsIn January 30, 2013 endeavours were made by this petitioner towards a strategy formulation and implementation of ‘Mutual Human Rights Law and Reparation Mechanisms’ between the Government of India and the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) countries, mandating our elected representatives and officials to eliminate discrimination and imbalances of Overseas Indians working in different countries. (‘Indo-Gulf reparation mechanisms’)

The Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi has written to the petitioner that the Government of India has established various arrangements for the welfare of Indian community and assistance to the distressed Indians abroad. (Letter: May 02, 2013).

Soon after the second reminder of the petitioner, the ministry wrote insistently, vide its letter that whatever the Ministry had written about it are only their ‘VISION’ and nothing else. The captions may hence, not be treated as confirmations. (Letter: July 09, 2013).

When the information sought under Right To Information Act, the Ministry of Labour & Employment has confirmed the MOU with GCC countries etc., to be treated as NIL (Letter: July 19, 2013)

Serious failures and inadequacies to comply with statutory or regulatory obligations on the part of the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) and the ‘Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs’ (MOIA) now stand proved by the subsequent communications received by the petitioner from the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India”.

The dreadful truth is, the bureaucrats in both the Ministries are pretend to be public servants, all the while they are greedy blood-suckers selling a vast majority of Indian workforce to all forms of modern-day slavery, to the so called Gulf States. On the receiving end, these migrants are exposed to gross violation of Human Rights and exploitation without due respect of their life and dignity.

About the Author:
P.K. Jabir is a torture survivor of inside the regime’’s brutal prison in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates and most importantly a THREE times of ‘Judgment Creditor’ (winner) from the Legal Courts of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Unfortunately, the law of the land is worth nothing, instead of enforcing the Court Orders, the victim had to undergo extremes of violence and abuse by State Police of Abu Dhabi, which no human being can withstand. Read more

Principal Source:
‘Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms’ Timeline Highlighting Submissions & Responses
http://reparationlaw.com/caselaw/indo-gulf-reparation-mechanisms-timeline-highlighting-submissions-responses/

Supported by: Legal Cell International

Landmark Judgments in the history of Abu Dhabi (UAE) Jurisprudence – Now on sale! http://www.judgmentforsale.com/investor.html

The ‘Sourcebook of Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms’

Dear Sponsor,

[You are cordially invited to join us as a Sponsor of the Sourcebook]

The ‘Sourcebook of Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms’ reveals a truly horrific experience, roughly 19 years of the author’s prime of life, who is a UAE torture survivor of inside the regime’s brutal prison in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates and most importantly a THREE times of ‘Judgment Creditor’ from the Legal Courts of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates and still is frustrated in the course of enforcing his judgments.

The book also exposes ‘the Myths and reality’ of the Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs & Ministry of Indian External Affairs.

The bureaucrats in both the Ministries (MOIA & MEA) are pretends to be public servants, all the while they are greedy blood suckers selling Indian workforce to the so called Gulf States, no matter how deeply their wounds may run. Indian migrants in the Gulf countries are continue to be exposed to the gross violation of Human Rights and exploitation, without due respect of their life and dignity.

On the other hand, the victimization is multiplied many fold by the lack of knowledge or understanding of international norms and standards among the judiciary, that has been entrusted with a greater responsibility of supporting the victims and the survivors….VISIT ‘JFS PUBLICATIONS!’

Posted in Abu Dhabi, Human Rights, Human Rights Law, India, Indo-Gulf Reparations, Judgments, Justice for Torture, Ministry of External Affairs, Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs, Sheikh Khalifa, Sheikh Mohammed, Survivors Support, Torture Abolition, UAE, UN Convention Against Torture, Uncategorized, United Arab Emirates, United Nations | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Allegations of Torture in the UAE Require Action

Allegations of Torture in the UAE Require Action
21/10/2013 Huffington Post UK

Over the past year there have been a number of allegations in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) that authorities are torturing prisoners. Defendants in a trial of political dissidents, three Britons held in Dubai and two Syrians have come out to say they have been tortured. Now, smuggled handwritten letters by Egyptian prisoners facing trial over alleged Muslim Brotherhood links say that they have been tortured as well.

The reaction from authorities has been to either ignore allegations or dismiss them as fantasy. This approach undermines the UAE’s commitment to the United Nations (UN) Convention Against Torture, which authorities signed up to in July 2012. In each case of alleged torture there has been an emphatic failure to conduct a thorough and impartial investigation.

It is of grave concern that authorities in the UAE are being allowed to misappropriate a crucial treaty for the purposes of furthering a broadly positive international image. Shortly after signing up to the Convention Against Torture, the UAE won a seat on the UN Human Rights Council at the same time as Human Rights Watch were reporting on enforced disappearances and torture in the country. Whilst Emirati authorities fail to meet their obligations it is difficult to conclude anything other than their very public commitment to human rights is nothing but a public relations exercise.

Handwritten letters by Egyptian prisoners include allegations consistent with those made by others, with prisoners saying they have been subjected to beatings, electric shocks and exposed to extremes of temperature in solitary confinement. Prisoners say guards have threatened them with HIV infection, sexual abuse and death while revealing that when they complain to the prosecutor, he has threatened them with further torture if they do not admit the charges against them.

The trial of these Egyptians is due to start on November 5th, when defendants will face charges of illegally establishing a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood in the UAE. It is crucial that authorities address these allegations prior to trial, otherwise the process will have little credibility. Authorities must approach this with impartiality in line with Article 12 of the Convention Against Torture, which requires an investigation wherever there is reasonable ground to believe an act of torture has been committed.

Concerns about the fairness of a trial for the Egyptians have been raised with the release of a report by the International Commission of Jurists that described a similar trial, that of the UAE 94, as ‘manifestly unfair’. It should be noted that of the 61 men currently serving prison sentences from that trial, 20 of them are on hunger strike protesting against alleged mistreatment by prison authorities.

The link between the UAE 94 and the trial of the Egyptians is clear to see. Both groups are accused of conspiratorial Muslim Brotherhood activities, which is the bogeyman of the day for Emirati authorities when dealing with political opponents. Indeed, the role of the UAE in Egypt’s military coup has been called into question following an interview with Ahmed Shafiq in which the former Egyptian Prime Minister admitted the UAE had given weapons to the Egyptian army prior to the massacres at Rabaa al-Adawiyya and Al Nahda.

There is a clear disconnect between the commitment to protect human rights made by the UAE and the reality of their actions in dealing with a political group they dislike and citizens who call for democratic reforms. Authorities have committed to preventing torture and sit on the Human Rights Council, yet fail to uphold their treaty obligations and openly support massacres by the army in Egypt.

At the heart of the issue here are human stories. The Sonbol family of Egypt is a tragic case in point. Ali Sonbol is an Egyptian who was arrested in the UAE on December 19th 2012 and is accused of illegal Muslim Brotherhood activities. He claims to have been severely beaten by prison guards, leaving him with a number of serious injuries. Tragically, Ali Sonbol’s 24-year-old son was killed in the massacre at Rabaa al-Awawiyya in August. Given that Ali Sonbol is being held at a secret prison it is unclear if he knows his son has been murdered. This family has suffered the full brunt of the UAE’s policies in aggressively attacking anyone associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.

It is a sad state of affairs when a country is allowed to, quite clearly, abuse the just cause of protecting human rights. For the Convention Against Torture and Human Rights Council to be effective it is vital that the UAE are demanded to investigate all credible allegations of torture. This includes the case of the Egyptian prisoners, the UAE 94, the three Britons and that of the two Syrians. Until that happens, the UAE are being allowed to make a mockery of the international protection of human rights with families like the Sonbols left to suffer the horrific consequences.
UAE-failing-to-tackle-prison-torture-aljazeera
Photograph: Abu Dhabi Police ‘UAE ‘failing to tackle prison torture’
Country accused of ignoring allegations of political prisoners being severely abused.

Posted in Abu Dhabi, Camel Jockeys, Dictators, Egyptian coup d'etat, Human Rights, Judgments, Justice for Torture, Non Violence, Sheikh Khalifa, Sheikh Mohammed, Survivors Support, Torture Abolition, UAE, UAE plots, UN Convention Against Torture, Uncategorized, United Arab Emirates, United Nations | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Justice for Torture Worldwide. Law, Practice and Agendas for Change

Justice for Torture Worldwide. Law, Practice and Agendas for Change
Published By REDRESS October 2013

REDRESS Report forms an integral part of the REDRESS initiative Reparation for Torture: Global Sharing of Expertise, supported by the European Union through the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights. The Report brings together the wealth of expertise generated and the experience shared in the course of this work, focusing on comparative law and practice relating to accountability and reparation.

ENFORCEMENT OF UAE JUDGMENTS: TRANSNATIONAL LITIGATION AND ARBITRATION

Help us reach our goals by making a contribution to enforce the UAE Judgment(s)

The petitioner, who is a UAE torture survivor of inside the regime’s brutal prison in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates and most importantly a THREE times of ‘Judgment Creditor’ from the Legal Courts of Abu Dhabi, and still frustrated in the course of enforcing his judgments. He is now aimed to take his case to the next level of courts, the “International Court of Justice and Arbitral Tribunals”.

We need your active support to expose the debtors who hide Judicial decisions, commit fraud and other henious acts to avoid honoring their obligations. …
Please visit “A PORTFOLIO OF UAE JUDGMENTS FOR SALE!??

Introduction
Torture has many faces. It is both secretive and ubiquitous, an intensely personal ordeal and a practice that affects society as a whole. While its particular features frequently have a local imprint, its prevalence is truly worldwide. This double nature is also reflected in global efforts to combat torture. Prevention of, and accountability and reparation for, torture are first sought at the domestic level. Indeed, international human rights law requires victims1 and those acting on their behalf to exhaust domestic remedies first before bringing claims to international bodies.

Advocacy efforts are also often directed at local actors, with a view to changing domestic mindsets and practices. At the same time, these efforts do not take place in isolation. Regional and international fora provide platforms for litigation and advocacy, and cooperation often transcends national and regional boundaries. Yet in practice, it is still rare for those working on torture cases to come together and share their expertise and experience. As a result, national laws and practices, and particularly jurisprudence, often remain little known externally beyond national borders and lawyers and others concerned may be ignorant of precedents, strategies and best practices developed elsewhere that may provide important tools for their daily work.

Relevant actors may also not fully benefit from having links to their counterparts in other countries and regions as networks remain underdeveloped. Victims of torture and ill-treatment The widespread practice of torture has resulted in a large number of victims from diverse backgrounds. While it is difficult to generalise, and therefore correct to say that anyone may become a victim of torture, it is equally clear that certain categories of persons are at a comparatively greater risk.

This applies in particular to those who are considered as an “enemy” of a regime or a particular way of life. Ill-treatment takes myriad forms, as demonstrated by the jurisprudence of courts and human rights treaty bodies, reports and the experience of human rights defenders.84 In addition to custodial issues of long-standing concern, such as poor prison conditions, solitary confinement, and denial of adequate medical care, which were found to be prevalent to varying degrees in all regions,85 there has been an increasing practice of ill-treatment outside the custodial context. This applies in particular to the use of excessive force, and other methods, during demonstrations. In the course of the uprisings in the Arab world, police, security and army forces repeatedly used teargas, birdshot and other weapons.

In Bahrain, for example, protesters were targeted and in several instances deliberately attacked – even though they ostensibly did not pose a security threat – a pattern suggesting that the policing of demonstrations was used as a cover for torture. The Legislative Framework: Making Torture and Ill-Treatment a Criminal Offence Many legal systems are characterised by shortcomings that undermine protection against, and accountability and justice for torture. These shortcomings are often due to the fact that unreformed ordinary legislation, such as criminal laws, does not adequately reflect international standards and best practices. As a result, such laws are ill-suited to address torture-specific concerns. Jurisprudence: Remedies and reparation for torture and ill-treatment While compensation frequently constitutes the primary or even only form of reparation, certain high courts have awarded broader forms of reparation, especially in the context of constitutional remedies. … Download “Full Report

About REDRESS
REDRESS is a human rights organisation that helps torture survivors obtain justice and reparation. REDRESS works with survivors to help restore their dignity and to make torturers accountable.

Torture- Abu-Dhabi-UAEPhotograph: Sheikh Issa bin Zayed Al Nahyan & Abu Dhabi Police Torture Guys in the Desert, United Arab Emirates. Video Report

Posted in Abu Dhabi, Dictators, Human Rights, India, Judgments, Justice for Torture, Non Violence, Sheikh Khalifa, Sheikh Mohammed, Survivors Support, Torture Abolition, UAE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

UAE plots behind Egyptian coup d’etat

UAE plots behind Egyptian coup d’etat
Cairo: August 18, 2013

Egypt-Is-Arena-for-Influence-of-UAEThe Abu Dhabi regime, United Arab Emirates, is one of the major sponsors of ‘Egyptian coup d’état’. Western diplomats here said they believed the Emiratis were privately urging the Egyptian security forces to crack down the supporters of ousted President Mohamed Mursi, that killed hundreds of people, when authorities forcibly broke up protest camps.

“Western governments took a wait-and-see approach even after the military committed its first mass killing, shooting more than 60 supporters of Mr. Morsi at a sit-in on July 8. Western diplomats did not engage in earnest until July 24, when General Sisi, in dark sunglasses and military regalia, delivered a fiery speech asking the public to turn out for demonstrations giving him a “mandate” to take on the Islamists. Security forces killed 80 more Morsi supporters in their second mass shooting on the day of the demonstration.

The next morning, Morsi aides and Brotherhood leaders say, their phones began ringing with American and European diplomats fearing an imminent blood bath.

The administration enlisted people on opposite sides of the contest unfolding in Egypt. Diplomats from Qatar, a regional patron of the Muslim Brotherhood, agreed to influence the Islamists. The United Arab Emirates, determined opponents of the Islamists, were brought in to help reach out to the new authorities.

But while the Qataris and Emiratis talked about “reconciliation” in front of the Americans, Western diplomats here said they believed the Emiratis were privately urging the Egyptian security forces to crack down.

Abdullah bin Zayed al-Nahyan, the Emirati foreign minister, went to Washington last month and urged the Americans not to cut off aid. The emirates, along with Saudi Arabia, had swiftly supported the military takeover with a pledge of billions of dollars, undermining Western threats to cut off critical loans or aid.

The Israelis, whose military had close ties to General Sisi from his former post as head of military intelligence, were supporting the takeover as well. Western diplomats say that General Sisi and his circle appeared to be in heavy communication with Israeli colleagues, and the diplomats believed the Israelis were also undercutting the Western message by reassuring the Egyptians not to worry about American threats to cut off aid.

Israeli officials deny having reassured Egypt about the aid, but acknowledge having lobbied Washington to protect it.

When Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, proposed an amendment halting military aid to Egypt, the influential American Israel Public Affairs Committee sent a letter to senators on July 31 opposing it, saying it “could increase instability in Egypt and undermine important U.S. interests and negatively impact our Israeli ally.” Statements from influential lawmakers echoed the letter, and the Senate defeated the measure, 86 to 13, later that day”.

Photograph: The interim Egyptian president, Adli Mansour, center, met with officials of the United Arab Emirates in Cairo. The richest monarchies have pledged $12 billion in cash and loans to Egypt, a decision aimed not only at shoring up a shaky transitional government, but also at undermining their Islamist rivals and strengthening their allies across a newly turbulent Middle East.

Read More at: ‘How American Hopes for a Deal in Egypt Were Undercut

More Resources:

Evil prospers when good men do nothing
‘Tolerating evil leads only to more evil. And when good people stand by and do nothing while wickedness reigns, their communities will be consumed’. Evil prospers when good men do nothing

Roundup of events in the Middle East: The Guardian
Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Kuwait, relieved to see the back of the Brotherhood, seen as a threat to their own monarchies, immediately promised $12 billion in aid to the new authorities, to help overcome imminent fuel and wheat shortages.

Western allies warned Egypt’s military leaders right up to the last minute against using force to crush protest sit-ins by supporters of the ousted Islamist president Mohamed Mursi, arguing they could ill afford the political and economic damage.

Hundreds of people died and thousands were wounded on Wednesday when police cleared out two protest camps in Cairo set up to denounce the military’s overthrow of Egypt’s first freely elected president on July 3 and to demand his reinstatement. Roundup of events the Guardian

Posted in Abu Dhabi, Dictators, Egyptian coup d'etat, Etihad Airways, Human Rights, Mohamed Mursi, Sheikh Khalifa, Sheikh Mohammed, UAE, UAE plots, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Moral Greatness of UAE is not admirable, and praised when they are not praiseworthy!

The Moral Greatness of UAE is not admirable, and praised when they are not praiseworthy!

The UAE has made impressive development in terms of infrastructure; but what about it’s moral greatness?   Abu Dhabi Crown Prince says ‘No one can harm UAE’s stature’, highlighted below in the press release.

Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, on Monday last  remarked, inter alia, “that the President, Sheikh Khalifa, was firm on the rule of law and promotion of principles of justice and independent justice”.  The justices thanked Sheikh Mohammed for his support and care for the judicial institutions “in order to deliver their noble message of dispensing justice and rule of law”.

This unique and united approach of both the Rulers and the Judges of the country gives some rays of hope to the “Judgment Creditors” of Abu Dhabi, UAE [Courtesy to ‘A Portfolio of UAE Judgments For Sale’].

The Right of Surety to Enforce Legal Judgments of Abu Dhabi, UAE

In the light of the above concurrent views and commitments of the Rulers and Judges of Abu Dhabi,  the agonies of victims “in not getting surety to enforce affirmed Judgments” can be expected to change. The implementation and enforcement of victims’ rights can contribute to the success of better future for all. Hence forth,  it is for the Rulers of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates to set in the form of a set of principles of best legal practice and render due justice to their victims and survivours.

Landmark Judgments Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates:
A couple of key excerpts are as follows:
Verily the Islamic Law and the entire Positive Laws have honoured Man and protected his freedom, his honour, his property and his soul. Hence, if a man was killed, while protecting these, he is considered to be a martyr. And limitation of his freedom without any rights is an unforgiving crime and the same is mentioned in the provisions of articles 2 and 3 of the Penal Procedures Code. And it is proved in this case that the policeman along with the plaintiff went to arrest the accused and to limitate his freedom…. Therefore, it is right of the accused to verify the reason behind which he going lo be arrested, and to take help of the security men and to defend his freedom. Highlights – The Higher Judiciary of Abu Dhabi (Courtesy to: Landmark Abu Dhabi Judgments For Sale – Support)

No one can harm UAE’s stature, Abu Dhabi Crown Prince says
Press release: Ola Salem    Jul 30, 2013

ABU DHABI // With a just judicial system the UAE’s stature is secure, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, told judges and the justice minister on Monday.

At his palace in Al Bateen, Sheikh Mohammed told Dr Hadef Al Dheheri and Abu Dhabi Federal Supreme Court Justices that public attacks could not harm the country with the rule of law.

“Despite some malicious voices and stances, no one can harm our stature as long as we have fair, honest and credible judicial institutions,” he said, according to Wam, the state news agency. He added that the country counts on the “independence and neutrality of the members of the judiciary” to enforce verdicts and legal principles.

Members of the Abu Dhabi Judicial Department and Abu Dhabi Public Prosecution were also present. At the meeting, Sheikh Mohammed stressed that justice delivers security and stability to communities. He said the President, Sheikh Khalifa, was firm on the rule of law and promotion of principles of justice and independent justice.

He said under the leadership of Sheikh Khalifa, the UAE would progress towards the aspirations and ambitions of the UAE people. Future plans and the need for developing human resources to cater to key national sectors were also discussed. “The human capital is the precious asset we own today and it is the real investment to address future challenges,” he said.

The justices thanked Sheikh Mohammed for his support and care for the judicial institutions “in order to deliver their noble message of dispensing justice and rule of law”, Wam reported. osalem@thenational.ae

Your Opinion about UAE’s Judicial Independence  

Abu Dhabi is the largest and wealthiest member of the United Arab Emirates. The country is attributed to authoritarian regime in which the government is ruled. Indeed the key challenges facing the UAE includes lack of accountability and total lack of judicial independence remain critical. What, man, defy the devil: Save mankind from dictators!

Why Is It Good to Invest In An Un-executed Criminal Judgment of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates?

Relief is the immediate help to change the underlying causes of abuse. The judgment debt is hanging over the Abu Dhabi Emirate, UAE from way back. The judgment is binding and enforceable by the court of Abu Dhabi from where the ruling came from. The debt of Abu Dhabi can be eliminated or satisfied by the enforcement of judgments those in question. Persistent failure to enforce court decisions leave victims demoralized and reinforce an existing culture of impunity. Establishing the Judgment value

 

Posted in Abu Dhabi, Dictators, Human Rights, Judgments, Sheikh Khalifa, Sheikh Mohammed, UAE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

‘Abu Dhabi, UAE, a Corrupt and Fraudulent Regime’

‘Abu Dhabi, UAE, a Corrupt and Fraudulent Regime’
Saudi Prince Khalid Bin Farhan Al-Saud has said wide open that Saudi Arabia, Corrupt and Fraudulent Regime [Global Research News, July 28, 2013]

Revelations of Prince Khalid Bin Farham similarly fit (or perhaps more aptly) for the U.A.E

Revelations of Prince Khalid Bin Farham similarly fit (perhaps more aptly) for the U.A.E

In fact, the above statements and revelations of Prince Khalid Bin Farham similarly fit (or perhaps more aptly) for the U.A.E. The Human Rights violations of UAE are rampant, infamous and notoriously evil. The people of that country are forbidden even from free talks. If any of them publishes anything against the Ruling Regime of UAE, he could be found in jail the very next day.

The “CRACK DOWN” of UAE on the innocent “social activists” who voiced just for a liberal society with a better pinch of democracy in place of the autocrat rule of UAE is best known to the entire world. A casual visit to the Abu Dhabi prisons, will reveal the intensity of the torture towards the prisoners. And, yet, UAE is a Member of the United Nations’ Human Rights Council, with an added responsibility of advising its neighbouring countries on “Improving their Human Rights Policies and activities!”

Saudi Prince Khalid Bin Farhan Al-Saud, who announced his defection from Al Saud royal family through a statement, has referred to his ‘sufferings’ under reign of Al Saud regime describing them as bitter experiences that will be revealed by the Saudi twitter writer Mujtahid and Saudi activist Saad al-Faqih, who is currently living in London.

He thanked God that helped him understand the truth about Saudi Regime through a “direct horrible personal experience” He said he thanked God that helped him understand the truth about Saudi regime through a “direct horrible personal experience” which helped him have a taste of what people suffered from through the country.

Other most striking points he mentioned are :

“With pride, I announce my defection from Al Saudi family in Saudi Arabia,” he wrote in his statement.

“This regime in Saudi Arabia does not stand by God’s rules or even (country’s) established rules and its policies, decisions, and actions are totally based on personal will of its leaders.”

“All that is said in Saudi Arabia about respecting law and religion rules are factitious so that they can lie and pretend that the regime obeys Islamic rules.”

He criticized the royal family for considering the country as its own property while silencing all voices from inside and outside the government calling for any change and reforms.

Khalid Bin Farhan said the ruling family has deliberately pulled the country to the current condition where cries of oppressed people are ignored. “They don’t think about anything but their personal benefits and do not care for country’s and people’s interests or even national security,” …. his speech concluded.

It is a total transformation of the UAE which is more important in the present context, compared to the devastating situation prevailing in Saudi Arabia as revealed by Prince Khalid Bin Farhan.

That will save hundreds of thousands of the UAE citizens and millions from other countries who have migrated to UAE, and a majority of them now remain destined to live like slaves or worse than that, under the dictatorial muscle power of the UAE ruling regime.

  • Together, let’s end Judgment Fraud in the UAE! (‘How do I become a voluntary contributor?’)
  • References:

    Useful Links:

    Promoting Human Rights Values in the Digital Age. Let’s Join

    Posted in Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi Police-Looting, Camel Jockeys, Decree Holders, Dictators, Enforcement of UAE Judgment, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Human Rights, Human Rights Law, India, Indo-Gulf Reparations, Judgment Creditors, Judgments, Justice for Torture, Landmark UAE Judgment, Ministry of External Affairs, Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs, Saudi Prince Khalid, Sheikh Khalifa, Sheikh Mohammed, Survivors Support, Torture Abolition, UAE, UAE Lawyers, UAE Ministry of Interior, UAE Reputation, Uncategorized, United Arab Emirates, United Nations | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

    What, man, defy the devil: Save mankind from dictators!

    Etihad Airways, the flag carrier of the UAE, is based at Abu Dhabi International Airport. The money power and the shrewd rulers of Abu Dhabi, it would appear, are out to capture the whole world. At a glance, no one will find anything unusual about the move of that country, under the guise of economic progression, in joining hands with other airlines. The dangers of such a collaborative movement, as indicated here are sure to take over the world in general and the involving countries in particular.  Once they succeed in these efforts, it is certain that these evildoers would easily make the supporting countries to their ‘economic slaves’.

    What, man, defy the devil: Save mankind from dictators!
    18 July, 2013 Reports, UAE Human Rights

    Abu Dhabi is the largest and wealthiest member of the United Arab Emirates. The country is attributed to authoritarian regime in which the government is ruled. Indeed the key challenges facing the UAE includes lack of accountability and total lack of judicial independence remain critical. Abu Dhabi is notorious for it’s Human Rights records, including “arbitrary arrests, torture, hiring and using foreign mercenaries in order to avoid pro-democracy protests in the Emirates as well as joins hand with their cronies to crush any democratic movements in the region. They have been supporting the Egyptian traitors to destroy the nation and make people worse than they are. They mounted up worth $12 billion in aid packages to bless the bloody military coup in Egypt, to restore the old authoritarian order against democracy.

    Etihad Airways, the Abu Dhabi-owned airline, commenced commercial operations in November, 2003, is one of the rapidly expanding airlines under the rule of a tyrant. Etihad has singled out from rivals Qatar Airways and Emirates, in a highly competitive region, by code share agreements with its partners. Etihad purchased nearly 30 percent of Air Berlin, Europe’’s sixth largest carrier, when Lufthansa has tried to block the Gulf carriers’ access to German airports. Aside from Air Berlin, Etihad has expanded its global network through three other equity stakes including a 10 per cent holding in Virgin Australia, a 40 per cent stake in Air Seychelles and smaller stakes in Virgin Australia and Ireland’s Aer Lingus.

    The media has reported that the Etihad Airways and other Gulf Carriers benefits from access to discounted or free aviation fuel, free corporate tax and non-union labour, particularly low-wage contract workers from India and Pakistan. Etihad Airways now converts Abu Dhabi International Airport as a major hub for connecting flights to their final destinations.

    Etihad Airways, the flag carrier of the UAE, is based at Abu Dhabi International Airport. The money power and the shrewd rulers of Abu Dhabi, it would appear, are out to capture the whole world. At a glance, no one will find anything unusual about the move of that country, under the guise of economic progression, in joining hands with other airlines. The dangers of such a collaborative movement, as indicated above are sure to take over the world in general and the involving countries in particular.  Once they succeed in these efforts, it is certain that these evildoers would easily make the supporting countries to their ‘economic slaves’.

    The history of Abu Dhabi has revealed widespread fraud and financial manipulations in the largest bank fraud in world financial history, described as the BCCI Banking Scandal. The State-owned Etisalat-PTCL’s privatization deal, a multi-billion dollar corruption scandal in Pakistan’’s history that followed. Doubtless, the autocratic rulers of Abu Dhabi is empowered with unaccountable wealth from tapping the immense natural oil and gas reserves. The history repeated in India in 2011 as revelations of the ‘2G Spectrum’ case in India foiled another attempt of Etisalat to make illegal gains in partnership with Swan Telecom. Not to mention the old but real stories of child camel jockeys, aged between 2 and 5 kidnapped mainly from Indian sub-continent and for their use in camel jockeying in Abu Dhabi. More Links: UAE Business & Research Resources

    REFERENCES

    U.S. ETIHAD Deal 

    The U.S. airline industry is the target, and it is the nation’s economic competitiveness that is at stake. Action from Congress is needed to overturn this misguided Abu Dhabi pre-clearance facility and prevent any similar project, in order to advance U.S. economic competitiveness in the face of unfair and heavily state-backed foreign airlines. Congress should make it clear that the Abu Dhabi preclearance facility is the wrong port of call.  Link: Plan To Aid Etihad Airways Is Outrageous

    JET-ETIHAD Deal

    ETIHAD Airlines has already entered into an agreement with Jet Airways of India. The former finance minister said he has no doubt that this deal is being rushed through and government agencies have not been allowed to examine the deal in all its ramifications. The media has exhaustive coverage of the issue meticulously pinpointed the corruption, lobbying and the malfunction of the government and the greedy politicians involved. Jet-Etihad deal: BJP demands SC monitored CBI inquiry

    ETISALAT, UAE, seek justice after alleged fraud

    The greed of the devil for making money by corrupting individuals, corporations or even a country is a never ending process; and its activities are spreading over the entire universe. ETISALAT, UAE, seek justice after alleged fraud

    ETISALAT’s multi-billion dollar corruption scandals

    UAE’s Etisalat & PTCL’s Privatization Deal in 2006 was the biggest financial SCAM in Pakistan’s history. The issues are still live between the parties. ETISALAT’s multi-billion dollar corruption scandals

    SOURCES OF TERROR:
    Abu Dhabi joins hand with Saudi Arabia to crush the democratic movements.

    Egypt’s military deposed Morsi on July 3: Abu Dhabi and their cronies are out to oust the democratic move by Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.  In the process 51 ousted president’s supporters were crushed down by bullets apart from the devastation and destruction in the country. Link: Money trail to Egyptian groups that pressed for president’s removal

    Governments Should Support Rights, Not Abusive Allies

    For reasons of principle and long-term interest, governments should stand firm with the people of the Middle East and North Africa when they demand their basic rights and work to ensure the transition to genuine democracies. Link: World Report 2012 Strengthen Support Arab Spring

    UAE, the making of a Police State

    The present UAE is led by two chief sheikhs from the regional regime of Abu Dhabi, who is first in importance the hereditary emir and president of the country, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, born in 1948, succeeded his father Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan on 03 November 2004. The other is his younger brother General Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, born in 1961, is the next in line to become President of the United Arab Emirates after Sheikh Khalifa.  Sheikh Mohammed became Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi in November 2004 and since then he became the Chairman of the Abu Dhabi Executive Council. In January 2005 he was appointed Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces. Later he was promoted to the rank of General. UAE, the making of a Police State

    True Horror Stories of United Arab Emirates (UAE)

    The Story of Camel Jockeys in UAE
    The jockeys are usually  young boys, two to seven year olds chosen for their light weight. The beginning of the races marks a festive season for the UAE’s people who are usually accompanied by traditional music and singing to the Arabian drum beats. The green, red, black and white national flag of the Emirates flutters atop high poles that line the road leading out from town. Read More: The Story of Camel Jockeys in UAE

    The Story of BCCI Banking Scandal
    Abedi created the UAE. He planted the idea of the UAE as a federation to Sheikh Zayed. These people had no standing anywhere in the world. They were smugglers and tribesmen. (The BCCI Banking Scandal). The chapter on BCCI banking scandal describes in detail the heinous crimes UAE did for every major terrorist service in the world. More: The BCCI Banking Scandal

    Explore the history of Unite Arab Emirates 
    Increasing British involvement in India beginning in the late eighteenth century quickened British interest in the gulf region as a means of protecting the sea routes to India. Before British intervention, the area was notorious for its pirates and slave trade and was called the Pirate Coast. Link: The piracy and slave trade in the gulf region

    Learn more about corrupt practices in UAE

     

     

    Posted in Abu Dhabi, BCCI Scandal, Camel Jockeys, Dictators, Etihad Airways, Human Rights, India, JET-ETIHAD Deal, Judgments, U.S. ETIHAD Deal, UAE, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments